|
|
 |
|
A True Story of a Shared Identity Both the below 'straight on' and 'profile' images were published in the 1982 New Jersey News Tribune, for the misleading purpose of identifying Irene Craigmile Bolam as she supposedly looked in the year of 1923. It was recently discovered
they were poorly achieved forgeries displayed within a contrived
attempt, to deceive the public into accepting plural individuals
as one person. (The 'Eye Comparisons' link also distinctly separates
the Irenes.)
| Straight on forgery... |
|
| ...only aligns with 1940s 'family identified' Irene Craigmile. |
|
| Profile forgery... |
|
| ...see below how Amelia's profile aligns from the neck up. |
|
Notice further below how the 'straight on' image above, displayed and dated '1923' in the New Jersey News
Tribune in 1982, perfectly matches the 1982 Memorial Dinner program cover image also displayed in the series. As well, notice
below how the profile image shown above right, also dated '1923' in the 82' Tribune matches Amelia's profile from the neck
up, although the torso and arm were poorly placed and noticeably appear out of proportion. By displaying such forged photo
images among others in the 82' Tribune, those responsible for doing so duped the public into not realizing how three different
women had the same identity attributed to them. As seen in the 1997-2004
Irene-Amelia forensic analysis, of the above two 'forgery photo' displays, in 2006 Irene's own seventy-two year old Son stated
he had "no idea" where either of the images came from and he had never seen them before. Yet they appeared in the
1982 New Jersey Tribune series in an attempt to put an end to the long standing suspicion... of the 'Irene' who Joe Gervais
met and photographed in 1965 having been the former Amelia Earhart. Below, and as seen in the New Jersey News Tribune Link, observe how the 1982 New Jersey News Tribune printed such
forged photos among other falsehoods as well, to make it appear as if a grand total
of three people were only one person. [Only distant non-legible photos of the original Irene Craigmile were published
in the series with neither of the forgeries meant to match her image.] Indeed, while the name "Irene Craigmile Bolam"
was attributed to both of these forged images, again the profile photo matched one person, and the straight-on photo matched
another person, leaving this portion of the analysis to reveal separate individuals falsely promoted as one person. Not to mention, where the 'Family Identified' Irene does perfectly match the straight-on
mug-shot forgery with the 82' Tribune series displaying a "1923" date on it, it's odd how no one seemed to notice
in almost sixty years, or by the time the 'Family Identified' Irene's photo appeared on Irene Bolam's Memorial Dinner Program
cover, if said "1923" photo image was real such a woman would have miraculously appeared to have hardly aged at
all. Not to mention she would have also managed to strike the same exact pose she did in 1923, while displaying the exact
same upper torso, neck, shoulders, face, teeth, nose shape et al. Deemed to have been 'forensically implausible' for such
a perfect alignment to occur again nearly sixty years later with such little aging, it is clear the Memorial Dinner photo
was used to forge the '1923' straight on image, and the age of the woman featured on the Memorial Dinner program cover was
more than likely fifty-eight years old. As well, to this day the woman featured on the Memorial Dinner program remains unidentified
for who she really was. Suspected to have been the described "Irene Jr." born in 1924, who had helped look after
the original Irene's son during her mid to late teen years, she definitely was not the Irene Craigmile Bolam who Joe Gervais
met and photographed in 1965 and soon after implicated as 'the former Amelia Earhart.' However the Gervais-Irene's photo image
and the 'program cover' woman's photo image appeared intermittently throughout the 1982 Tribune series identifying them as
one in the same "Irene Craigmile Bolam."
|
|
"In the United States, if an issue is 'sealed by an Executive Order' by the Executive Branch
of its government it is done so by a sitting President, and only a sitting President controls the ability to unseal such a
thing. There is no doubt FDR's administration, almost certainly with FDR's complete awareness and endorsement, optioned to
withhold and seal the reality of Amelia Earhart after she was reported 'missing' by the press to the public in 1937. This
is surely why 'official silence' towards the Earhart disappearance matter has always been the stance maintained by the U.
S. Government. But it gets more complicated than that. Even if a sitting President wanted to unseal an old 'sealed by a past
President' Executive Order, he would no doubt require the counsel, support, and endorsements of his top White House and Executive
Branch advisors. Such 'advisors' would in turn seek out the most respected 'historically informed' individuals on the issue
before offering counsel, and where post WWII international diplomacy (Japan) was also attributed to the Earhart case, one
can see why the official silence policy towards Earhart's post-loss reality
came to exist." Joe Gervais, 2001 (paraphrased) [See the 'transparent overlay' comparisons shown farther down below, followed
by the forensic analysis paragraph describing
the long term effect of Amelia's past nasal surgeries.]
|
| 1935 Profile of Amelia. |
|
|
| (See forgery profile match below.) |
The below forgery efforts were displayed in the 1982 Woodbridge New Jersey News
Tribune. (Both images shown were dated 1923. According to record, the original Irene would have still been known then as the
nineteen year old 'Irene Madaline O'Crowley.') First evidenced in Beyond 37's seven year forensic study, the images marked
nothing less than a profile & straight on, mugshot forgery display. In the 'profile' version, notice how badly the arm
was placed on the torso. As well however, does the profile forgery image from the neck up look familiar? See for youself.
It matches Amelia's to a 't' as the overlay test (further below) reveals. The mock-up work applied to existing photographs,
appeared to have been contrived for a realization, where the 'mugshot forgeries' were produced to identify separate human
beings as one within the context of the fraud-lined 1982 Tribune Series. Again, it is worth noting how the 1982 Woodbridge
New Jersey News Tribune series, that appeared over a two-week span from mid-October to October 29, 1982... was assembled with
an objective in mind to first entice its readers into re-considering the long held rumor, of the recently deceased Irene Craigmile
Bolam having been the former Amelia Earhart. Yet the entire effort was no doubt, nothing more than a divisive ploy. For on
the day the series ended, its use of forgeries falsely enabled the series to conclude how such a thing wasn't likely. It is
also worth noting how John Burk, the Tribune's publisher had also been a past good friend of Irene- Amelia's. Indeed, it was
Mr. Burk himself who emceed the lavish October 29, 1982 Irene Bolam Memorial Dinner, that was held on the last day of the
series installments.
| Straight on 1982 NewsTribune 'mug-shot' forgery. |
|
|
| This '1923' dated image matches the older version of the 'Irene' identified in 2006 by her Son. |
| See below; forgery matches Amelia's profile. |
|
|
| Dated '1923' in the 1982 New Jersey News Tribune |
| Combined, Amelia's profile matches the forgery... |
|
|
| ...from the neck up. The added torso is out of proportion. |
| Amelia profile, taken in 1935... |
|
|
| ...from the neck up aligns well with above 1923 profile forgery. |
|
| 1982 'Irene Craigmile Bolam' |
|
|
| This is a different person than the one on the right, who Gervais met and photographed in 1965. |
Directly below this middle column see the different Irene Craigmile Bolam (identified
in 2006 by the original Irene Craigmile's 1934 born Son as his Mother) than the ones displayed on the right or left. [NOTE:
Based on the different forgeries employed, it can be ascertained that none of the images shown in this entire three column
allotment of photos and forgeries, represents the true past image of the original Irene O'Crowley Craigmile.] The center
woman's true ID value remains unknown to this day, though research offers her as the 1924 out-of-wedlock Canadian born,
non recognized birth daughter of Lloyd Royer and Amelia Earhart. (Born to the pre-famous Amelia in her
twenty-seventh year.) Photos of her are scarce. Irene's Son claims to have no pictures of his
Mother pre-dating 1947. And only the woman in the right column photos had been publicly identified as Irene Craigmile ('Bolam'
added after her 1958 marriage to Guy Bolam) from the mid 1940s on, until she died in 1982. For two decades from 1982
to 2002 the red herring newspaper series cloak
went undetected. In 2004 it was also clearly indicated how the woman below was still living then, and how her photo image
on the Memorial Dinner program displayed her at her true age of fifty-eight years in 1982. Notice as well, how perfectly the
straight on forgery matches the Memorial Dinner cover photo. As the cover photo had also repeatedly appeared in the 1982 Tribune
series, and as the straight on forgery was dated "1923," in comparing the two with over fifty years time passage
factored in it would appear the Memorial Dinner cover Irene Bolam barely aged at
all in over five decades ...if said '1923' to '1982' images represented her real aging-process difference.
| Older version of Irene Jr. as Irene C. Bolam |
|
|
| Gervais never met this 'Irene Craigmile Bolam' (Cover date 10/29/82) |
| 'Early 1940s Mother' Identified by her Son. |
|
|
| More likely a late 1940s photo of the enigmatic Irene Jr., described as age '16 or 17' in 1940. |
| Clearly the 1982 Memorial Dinner cover photo... |
|
|
| ... was used to forge the '1923' dated straight onTribune mug-shot. |
| 1945-1982 ID'd Irene-Amelia profile, Detroit, 1976 |
|
|
| ...nose fix, head slightly turned to her right with harsher lighting. |
|
| 1965 Joe Gervais photo of 'Irene Craigmle Bolam' |
|
|
| A different person than the Irene Craigmile Bolam shown at left. |
The Irene Craigmile Bolam photos in this column (Irene-Amelia) display a haunting
reality. When the 1945 ZONTA photo (seen further down below the '1933 Amelia' photo) was shown to her Son in 2006,
he said he'd never seen it before. Yet a version of it had appeared in the 1982 News Tribune series. It was known how
the original Irene Craigmile had been a "pal" of Amelia Earhart's and Viola Gentry's. The connection was
through Amelia, who was friends through ZONTA and professional circles with the original Irene's Aunt, a past recognized
NY-NJ Attorney. Overlays of this Irene match Amelia's head to toe image spot on. And she is the same 'Irene'
who Joe Gervais met and photographed in 1965 on Long Island during a gathering of 'The Early Birds of Aviation' club.
With no family, friend, or archived yields, it also became evident no photos existed in the public realm depicting this 'Irene'
prior to the 1945 ZONTA photo. This Irene Craigmile Bolam who Joe Gervais met in 1965... appeared as someone
else before the 1940s. With the plurality of Irene's realized, so much had become plainly evident by 2006. Plain
logic further dictated how she was the slight visage changed, former Amelia Earhart.
| 1933 Amelia Earhart photo. |
|
|
| A little grainy, but okay for blending with the Gervais photo below. |
| 1965 Joe Gervais photo of Irene Craigmile Bolam... |
|
|
| ...blended with Amelia's above displays a haunting congruence. |
| 1945 Zonta photo of Irene Craigmile (Bolam.) |
|
|
| AE would have been 48. Note: Makeup & jewelry, no tooth gap & nose difference. |
| Yet by removing her post-loss augmentations... |
|
|
| ...it's not so hard to realize again, the Amelia we all knew. |
| The two photos to the left combined... |
|
|
| ...do reveal a remarkable congruence. |
|
|
|
|
Bottom Left to Right Row Of Photo Comparisons; Slight Nose Difference Explanation: Something
important to realize about the previous visual comparison information, especially where the 'forgeries' are concerned:
Few people are aware of Amelia Earhart's storied history of sinus problems ever since she served as a nurse in Canada
during World War One. Her various biographies all reference her nasal trouble and surgical procedures she endured to correct
it. Yet, depending on the account one might read and/or accept, no less than five different operations she underwent from
1919 to 1934 can be found. [A closer examination of Amelia's personal life history reveals, it was most likely the case
only two procedures were actually performed.] Hence, after experts observed the 1945 Irene-Amelia Zonta photo they cited clear
evidence of a deviated septum rhinoplasty procedure having been performed at some time previous. [Break nose
cartilage below eye center bridge bone, slightly press down, slightly flare nostrils &
open passages.] On top of this, some 'skin-tucking' appeared to have thinned the look of her upper nose bridge.
So much would have served a dual purpose both nasal-wise and cosmetically, where it also obscured Amelia's recognizable
visage in later years. As Amelia, two of the surgeries she was described to have endured included a "Caldwell-Luc"
procedure and an "Antrum" correction, or as her Sister Muriel described "a small bone removal" to help
clear her nasal passage. So if one closely examined and compared Amelia's nose 'look' from when she was in her
early twenties to the way it looked just before she turned up missing in 1937, a difference in appearance was already detectable.
What's more, looking at the 1923 'profile forgery' shown above, it appears to show a slight convex curvature in
the nose bridge. Yet such a nose bridge 'curve' is not detectable in any post 1930s photos of Irene-Amelia, and when
comparing it to the "1976 in Detroit" Irene-Amelia photo just above, one easily sees the difference; there is no
convex curve in the bridge. As well, the 'Detroit' photo, that was taken after she read poetry to the Zonta chapter
there, otherwise appears to align with Amelia's 1935 profile with exactitude. It's also a forensic reality, how to
varying degrees depending on the individual, noses and ears do continue grow and 'sag' a bit into old age, slightly
changing in appearance. For a relative example, one might examine Amelia's Sister, Muriel's nose and ears in the 1930s
compared to the way they looked in the 1980s, where some continued growth differences can also be detected. Re-Cap Explanation: Recall how in 2006 Irene's 1934 born
Son (her only child) claimed he held no photos of his mother preceding the year of 1947. No legible photos of the original
Irene from prior to the 1940s were ever located or presented by any of her survived family, especially since the controversy
about her true past identity arose in 1970. And so much remains the case today. Above,
as observed by the viewer, the blended images shown separately in the middle column
and in the left column do exemplify a profile
and straight-on 'Mug-Shot'
forgery display. [Similar to how a law enforcement agency photo documents for image identification.] To ensure success with
the contrived newspaper fraud, it was essential for the 1982 New Jersey News Tribune to make certain the different human beings
were identified as one. Therefore, where the middle straight-on blended photo images essentially matched the 'early 1940s family identified Irene Craigmile,' in turn the left column blended profile images essentially
matched Amelia Earhart's profile, further enabling them to also match
the later profile of 'Irene-Amelia.' (See the 'Comparison Samples' link to observe more overlays.) At the same time, the
blended photo images shown in the right hand column, blended the 1933 straight-on
photo image of Amelia Earhart with the Joe Gervais straight-on photo of the Irene Craigmile Bolam (Irene-Amelia) he met in
1965..., and Amelia's 1935 profile with Irene-Amelia's 1976 profile. Gervais took his 'Irene photo' at a gathering
of mostly retired senior citizen pilots, many of whom were well known in their day. It is clearly the case how the Joe Gervais
'Irene' photo image aligned astonishingly well with Amelia's photo image. As well, and again, where both the Tribune
profile and straight-on 'Mug-Shot' photos had the year of '1923' attributed to them in the series, in the
straight on photo it's incredibly hard to fathom how the 'family identified Irene Craigmile' shown on the 1982
Memorial Dinner Program Cover, was able to strike the exact same pose as she did in 1923, while also appearing to have barely
aged in almost six decades; and in the '1923' dated profile image, the arm on the torso appears as disproportionate.
Hence, and obviously, where both Amelia and her later self of Irene-Amelia match the profile forgery, they only do so from
the neck up. To further edify for one's self the forensic separation of the
'family identified Irene' from 'Irene-Amelia' that clearly distinguishes them as two separate human beings,
please see the 'Eye Comparisons' link. Also continue to bear in mind,
neither one of the straight on and profile 'mug-shot' identified Irenes, displays the original Irene Craigmile's
image. Therefore, and to address the skeleton in the closet... What
happened to the original Irene Craigmile? Without authoritative help it is hard to answer such a pertinent question
with exactitude. It is known the original Irene Craigmile gave birth to her Son in March of 1934. Then, evidently at
some point after that or perhaps adjacent to it, the original Irene Craigmile disappeared and was never seen again. Such a
reality at least in part, explains how the image of the 'Early childhood mother identified by her Son' photo of Irene
Craigmile, looked so different when compared to the Irene Craigmile image displayed in the 1945 ZONTA photo shown above. And
again, neither of the Irene Craigmile images displayed above evidenced the original Irene Craigmile's image. Obviously,
such a human-duping math problem was not a simply contrived arrangement. In 2002, the then still in progress 'Body Comparison Forensic Analysis' that commenced in 1997, confirmed the reality of more than one person
having been displayed as "Irene Craigmile Bolam" throughout the 1982 fraud-lined Irene
Bolam-Amelia Earhart investigative series that ran for two weeks in The Woodbridge
New Jersey News Tribune after Irene-Amelia's passing.
|
|
|
Is it possible there may have been some non (publicly) detected 'understanding' between different Irenes who
at times employed the same identity? [NOTE: According to history, said three different people amounted to one person
only.] Would it not have been likely, where at times all employed the same identity such would have been done with
close attention paid to non-detectability? This seems very likely. One early 1990s tape recorded interview with
a 1970s friend of Irene's conveyed how "...someone had died long ago and that's how Amelia was able to use the
name." But there exists no Irene Craigmile (or Heller) death record from the 1930s era. ('Irene Heller' was her 1933
added surname removed by a 1940 annulment.) The original Irene did have a prominent physician Uncle, one Dr. Clarence
Rutherford O'Crowley whose Sister was Amelia's Attorney Zonta friend, Irene Mary Rutherford O'Crowley, or the
original Irene Craigmile's Aunt. Was the original Irene's death somehow covered up? Or as one physician suggested,
did her 1934 childbirth episode leave her an invalid where no death was recorded? These ideas are highly
precarious notions to consider. Amelia could have found herself in a situation however, where accepting such a plan-offer
to inherit the original Irene Craigmile's identity for her own later use provided a needed resolve. Anyway, the list
of possibilities of what might have happened to the original Irene Craigmile seems endless. Even remotely estimating
what happened to her remains hard to do without truth knowing guidance. So the real answer exists anymore in the form of a
closet-skeleton, and further complimented the reasons to never allow the unearthing of the true story.
Not to mention, and although he was quoted in the 1982 News Tribune series that he preferred not to comment to
the press about it, (see miscellaneous page) less than a decade later the elderly Monsignor James
Francis Kelley, a former President of Seton Hall University and close later life friend of Irene-Amelia's, admitted
in a taped interview how the post 1930s Irene Craigmile Bolam who died on July 7, 1982... indeed had been the living, former Amelia Earhart. The Monsignor was well known in his day, and he had acquainted
a lot of famous people to include Charles Lindbergh. No doubt as well, Kelley had been privy to some issues
the general public never was. He also accomplished many important things and was part of several high profile
issues in his day. His 1987 Seton Hall Published autobiography bears this out in no uncertain terms. In 1991 Monsignor
Kelley (who died in 1996) also mentioned how he wrote a chapter for his book about his long time post-war friendship
with 'Amelia.' Evidently though, and no doubt to avoid causing public consternation, Monsignor Kelley's editors
chose to not include his 'Amelia chapter' in his book's final edition. (One of Kelley's later life
friends, Donald Dekoster did mention how the Monsignor continued to refer to Irene-Amelia as just 'Amelia.'
In 1979 he was also told by Monsignor Kelley that he'd be introduced to 'Amelia' during a pending visit she was
planning to the Virgin Islands. Dekoster went on to say due to her 'illness' her trip was cancelled so such a
meeting never happened. Yet all of this and much more was recorded clearly during his tape recorded interview.
Friends whom had known the Monsignor during his later life years, the aforementioned Donald DeKoster of
Detroit, Michigan one of them, Helen Barber of Wayne, Pennsylvania another, and even a past news reporter by the name
of Dean Magley stood by Kelley's Irene-Amelia offering. A former auto industry executive, DeKoster who was a
Winter Virgin Islands next-door neighbor and "quite close" friend of Kelley's, especially felt the Monsignor
was of sound mind when he first started explaining his Irene-Amelia story to him on St. Croix, V.I. in 1979. (Kelley
would have been seventy-seven at that time.)
Did adversary Amelia Earhart researchers control the right
in the 1990s, to suggest Monsignor Kelley fabricated his Irene-Amelia story? Hardly. Monsignor Kelley had been privately
conveying his Irene-Amelia account to select trusted friends of his for almost two decades by the time he died in
1996. He was great friends with Irene-Amelia, had served as her confessor and therapist, and his Sister, Gertrude traveled
extensively with Irene to included internationally, throughout the 1970s decade. Monsignor Kelley's friends also described
him to have been fully in control of his faculties when he began revealing his story, and he was still active in church and
community affairs at that time. Said time period also marked twenty years before the Irene-Amelia physical congruence
to Amelia Earhart would be solidified by virtue of the 1997-2004 forensic analysis, and even longer before the analysis evidenced
the plural-Irenes discovery in 2002. Add to this, far be it from anyone, to pass such harsh judgment on the famous
Monsignor. For note as well, how in Monsignor Kelley's autobiography he is shown in many photographs standing or sitting
next to such famous individuals as former New Jersey Governor Brendon Byrne, former Baseball Commissioner Bowie Kuhn, Admiral
Chester Nimitz, Jackie Gleason who was a long time dear friend of his, famous LPGA golfers (who Irene-Amelia
also at times cavorted with) J. Edgar Hoover, Pat O'Brien, Chief Justice Vanderbilt, Ed Sullivan, Pope Paul VI, (who stayed
overnight at Monsignor Kelley's Rumson, New Jersey mansion home during his 1960s Papal visit to the United States) Betty
Ford, and more. There's even a photograph of Kelley standing next to his own bust statue commissioned by the Smithsonian
Institute dated 'ca. 1946.' He is also shown standing next to his sibling Sisters, among them Gertrude
Kelley Hession, who as mentioned became a main traveling partner of Irene-Amelia's in the 1970s, after Irene-Amelia's
husband, Guy Bolam died.
So yes, in spite of many existing photos that display Monsignor
Kelley and Irene-Amelia together looking truly endeared to each other, as well as letter exchanges expressing their
fond mutual admiration for each other, and even more photos that feature Gertrude Kelley Hession and Irene-Amelia on
various 1970s world sojourns together... it should strike one as fairly odd how nowhere in Monsignor Kelley's autobiography
is his dear friend 'Irene' mentioned at all, nor is a photograph of her ever displayed in it. And this, after Monsignor
Kelley claimed with certainty he included an entire chapter about her that was meant for his book. Exasperating,
isn't it?
Of course, the woman featured above in the middle
photos surely never was Amelia Earhart. It has even been intimated she is in her eighties today while residing in Connecticut.
Again, neither she nor Irene-Amelia were the original Irene Craigmile.
So we'll repeat the question:
What became of the original Irene Craigmile? Again the two week October of 1982 Woodbridge New Jersey News Tribune 'investigative
series' offered a mixed batch of different, yet at times altered photos to account for Irene's life
story. Again though, one John Burk was the Trib's publisher then, and he had also been a good friend
of Irene-Amelia's. Mr. Burk even mc'd Irene's 1982 memorial dinner that featured the (shown middle above)
woman's image on its program cover. And one of the most telling realizations later, was how beyond the Trib's forgery
lined display one would not find any family or school pictures of the original Irene Craigmile from her childhood. No church,
Jr. High or High School photo portraits would be found. No photos of her appeared in her so-called high school graduation
yearbook. One would also not find legible family portraits that featured her. Or one would not find pictures of
her with either of her two husbands from the 1920s and 1930s, those of Charles Craigmile or Alvin Heller. Even her living
Son today states he personally holds no photos of his Mother that display her image prior to the mid-1940s. And all of this
should sound odd, where Irene's own 'O'Crowley' kin had been a fairly prominent Irish-Catholic family,
leaving one to strongly consider how better family photo records of her person, most likely did exist.
|
|
|
To the press in 1970, Irene-Amelia claimed she was "not a mystery woman, and not Amelia Earhart." While
technically correct speaking in the present tense, she was no ordinary housewife as she claimed either. She was a constant
world traveler the last decades of her life, and in the 1970s one would have found her listed as President of Radio Luxembourg
that had been her late British husband, Guy Bolam's endeavor for many years. Guy Bolam who Irene-Amelia married in 1958,
died in 1970. He was later described to have been 'MI6' by his survived family.
|
|
|
Click here to e-mail Irene-Amelia.com and/or Beyond 37' for additional information, and/or available remaining points. Or,
send an e-mail message to EarhartTruth@Irene-Amelia.com
NOTE: To contact Beyond 37'
e-mail EarhartTruth@Irene-Amelia.com. The Beyond 37' film, book, and website
projects are dedicated to the late USAF Major Joseph A. Gervais (1924-2005) and the late USAF Col. Rollin C. Reineck (1920-2007).
Both were World War Two heroes who learned the basic Irene-Amelia truth decades ago. Major Gervais, who was considered by
many to have been the most devoted Amelia Earhart researcher ever having pursued the mystery since 1960, discovered the
Irene-Amelia reality in 1965. The controversial 1970 McGraw-Hill book by Joe Klaas, Amelia Earhart Lives expounded
on the enormous amount of Joe Gervais' investigative research, and displayed the first nationally published photo of
Irene-Amelia. Myriad fallout the Amelia Earhart Lives book caused notwithstanding,
and still lacking official authoritative guidance, Colonel Reineck spent the last several years of his life trying to
advance the Gervais claim of Earhart's name-changed survival to authenticity. Colonel Reineck's book Amelia Earhart Survived,
published in late 2003, was largely inspired by the Irene-Amelia forensic studies of Beyond 37's Tod Swindell. Several
portions of the analysis appeared in the Reineck book, and more samples are better displayed in this website. [Beyond 37'
was formed in 2001 by the Tod Evan Company in Los Angeles. It is run by Investigative Researcher/Filmmaker Tod
Swindell, who also serves as Chief Editor of Irene-Amelia.Com] Irene-Amelia.com
totals to date since being posted last year: 512,217 world-wide hits; 171,405 downloads. Canada, Germany, Great Britain, and
Japan lead for most foreign country views. The most viewed pages and/or links are: 'The History of Amelia Earhart Mystery
Research' page, the 'Odd Rumors' page, the 'Hilary Swank Amelia movie' page, the 'Amelia at the Microphone' photo link shown
on the home page, the 'Why The Fear' page, the various 'Physical Comparison' pages, and the 'Forensic Conclusion' page.
|
|
|
|
