|
Question: What do various "Earhart
researchers" who oppose the Irene-Amelia claim say about it?
Answer: What they definitely
do not say, is if it was possible to prove the claim wrong since it first arose in 1970, such a thing would have been done
by now.
It's clear, since the 1970s the Irene-Amelia claim has quietly been
'officially permitted' to remain as a debated controversy by intention. If the claim wasn't valid, with ease the Smithsonian
Institute and/or official government historians would have proved it false long ago. Not to mention the families of the original
Irene and/or Amelia's would have done the same thing. Keeping quiet about it while leaving it in an ongoing 'public debate'
state for nearly four decades, is historical dictum's back door way of silently admitting there is something to the Irene-Amelia
conveyance. [Please also see the 'Wikipedia' link on the left.]
 Presenting the 'False Prophets' of the Amelia Earhart Mystery: Alex Mandel, Bill Prymak, Carol Linn Dow,
etc.
Although the Irene-Amelia claim has never been disproved, over the years
opposing researchers have been claiming it was disproved in one way or another. Also, national institutions favoring the crashed
and sank scenario of Earhart's demise, have traditionally met the Irene-Amelia challenge by shedding a 'suspicious' light
on the topic. The most recent example of this was noticed in the case of Bill Prymak of the Amelia Earhart Society, whose
influence over the National Geographic Society's independent film producer, Noel Dockstater was obvious. Mr. Prymak, a wealthy
retired construction engineer from Broomfield, Colorado established and self-financed his 'Amelia Earhart Society' club back
in 1989, with an apparent objective in mind, to for some reason, always decry the Gervais-Irene reality.
With
Bill Prymak's encouragement, in 2006 Noel Dockstater engaged a Forensic Detective named Kevin Richlin to appear on his National
Geographic Channel special about Amelia Earhart. Detective Richlin openly admits he did not forensically 'prove' the images
he compared were not of the same human being. Still, after the show aired Alex Mandel of the Ukraine, an Amelia Earhart traditionalist
and good friend of Bill Prymak's falsely influenced the on-line encyclopedia Wikipedia with a lengthy diatribe of misinformation,
incorrectly stating Detective Richlin had finally proved the claim 'false.' Here are a few of the 'many reasons why' Kevin
Richlin himself refuses to say he disproved the claim:
After
being engaged by National Geographic, Detective Richlin was given a few minutes of airtime in its 2006 Earhart Special. He
conveyed his assessment of the Gervais-Irene in comparison to Amelia Earhart's image. (See the 'Eye Comparisons' link for
more pertinent information found beneath the visuals there.) However, Detective Richlin never fully addressed the equation.
Nor did he display and/or discuss the full body, arm length, hand, and feet comparisons, or at all address the handwriting
and voice comparisons. Nor did he discuss the personal background forensic argument about the Gervais-Irene, to include the
recent discovery of more than one person having shared the same Irene Craigmile Bolam identity, and how the one who Joe Gervais
met does not appear in photographs identified as 'Irene Craigmile' prior to 1945. All of this infromation was furnished to
Noel Dockstater. However, Kevin Richlin conducted a minimal facial null hypothesis only, and simply pointed out the same anomalies
previously conveyed and already accounted for and explained within the context of Beyond 37's forensic analysis. Needless
to say, all of the issues mentioned here are included among the 'many' reasons Detective Richlin could not himself nullify
the Gervais-Irene assertion. As well, the amount of information National Geographic supplied him with was minimal, and he
discounted it as such in its program. No matter though, Carol Linn Dow for example, whose recent book effort called The Lost
Flight of Amelia Earhart (one that basically supported a 'Earhart survived beyond the date of her disappearance in the hands
of the Japanese but she did not change her name to Irene' slant) re-conveys the work of Goerner, Briand, Loomis, Gervais &
Klaas, Brink, and others much the same way Dave Bowman's 2005 book Legerdemain did, only Dow's also endorsed the rambling
'anti-Irene' tirades of Alex Mandel as 'fact' rather than 'fiction,' to compliment her many years old obsession against the
Gervais-Irene account. Ever since Beyond 37' encountered Ms. Dow in 2001, she's constantly been shaking her head 'no' to the
mere mention of the Irene-Amelia conveyance, as if she was aware of something everyone else was not.
Dow
and Mandel made no mention though, of how National Geographic itself refused to display the latent multiple Irene's discovery.
Ultimately its traditional agenda to make light of and disregard the claim appeared rather obvious. And Det. Richlin likely
had no idea he was being engaged, merely to once again shore-up the past white-washing efforts meant to instill public doubt
in the Amelia-became-Irene idea, in place of conducting a more thorough examination.
Prymak,
Dockstater and National Geographic, Mandel and Dow, and sadly poor Kevin Richlin himself are controlled examples of the traditional
way (since 1970) historical dictum has back-door propagandized its Irene-Amelia case influence to academia and national news
media outlets. Over the years the Smithsonian Institute itself has purposefully, albeit falsely profiled the Amelia-became-Irene
reality by downgrading the quantity and/or quality of the long term and 'thoroughly cumulative' investigative efforts, beginning
with those of USAF Major Joe Gervais. As well 'official history' has always avoided involving the families of Amelia or the
original Irene Craigmile whenever it addressed the Irene-Amelia subject. [Examples: The 2006 National Geographic special still
in reruns today, or even dating back to Leonard Nimoy's "In Search Of" TV series Earhart episode, not to mention
the Gervais-Irene's 1970 to 1975 law suit (with a case ending 'trifle' ten-dollar consideration paid by plaintiff Irene and
defendant Joe Gervais to each other... after she refused to volunteer her fingerprints to validate her identity) yes, notice
how no members of the original Irene Craigmile's or Amelia's families ever appeared on any of the investigative TV segments,
nor did they accompany her or testify during her law suit.]
Note
about the law suit: After McGraw-Hill published the book Amelia Earhart Lives in the Fall of 1970, the Gervais-Irene sued
Authors Gervais and Joe Klaas, as well as McGraw-Hill for libel. It was described as a 'summary judgment hearing.' The case
lasted five years and made its way to the New York supreme court. Two of the defamatory contested facts she cited in the book
were: (1.) The book described her British husband Guy Bolam as "her alleged husband" where it was provable she and
Guy were legally married in 1958. (2.) The book described one of her homes as 'property owned by Jackie Cochran and her husband,
Floyd Odlum' without being able to prove it. Joe Gervais later maintained, "She never sued us for implicating her as
the former Amelia Earhart. She sued us for suggesting things she considered damaging to her character and other misstated
facts. One of the stipulations she somehow got the court to agree to, was how we weren't allowed to ask her about her life
prior to 1937." Gervais also described, "She was to be awarded better than a one million dollar sum for damages.
I agreed to it on the condition she volunteer her fingerprints to prove her true identity. She refused to do so, thus turning
down the one million dollar settlement. That's how we ended up paying ten dollars to each other to end it. Apparently she
didn't need the money." (McGraw-Hill did end up paying her a high five-figure amount, for publishing unauthorized and
at times 'incorrect' or 'misleading' information about her.) When she died in 1982 she donated her body to medical science
at Rutgers University, again disabling 'positive ID checking' in a final sense. Rutgers later provided a statement describing
how her body was eventually cremated and buried in a common grave.
Mandel's
False Rebuttals:
A self-proclaimed Earhart lover
and image protector, during the past five years the relatively unknown Ukrainian physicist, Dr. Alex Mandel has been arguing
against the Irene-Amelia conveyance both in public and over the internet. See for one's self, 'Dr. Mandel' is a somewhat curious
individual to be sure. Nary a soul heard of him in the world of Earhart research until the Associated Press began to report
on the Irene-Amelia 'forensic analysis.' Since then the image passionate young physicist has sold his name with his strong
slant against the Irene-Amelia claim, especially anywhere the name Irene Craigmile Bolam is mentioned on the internet. He
seems to operate with an agenda of decrying the 1945-1982 identified Irene Craigmile as the former Amelia Earhart, and even
at times the World War Two vets who did so much to advance the reality of the Gervais-Irene claim during the previous decades.
Indeed it's hard not to notice, how 'Dr.' Mandel's fanaticism towards Amelia's 'historical purity' is devout, if not peculiar.
On
the internet Mandel offers lengthy composed statements doing his best to decry every aspect of the Irene-Amelia conveyance.
He campaigns how the logic of the claim and the forensic analysis were not at all justified nor well founded, even though
it is highly obvious they were. He was politely offered to view non-published research material and information on the matter
during a stateside visit he made, to include opinions of experts who ascertained the multiple Irene's discovery. He declined
the invitation, and otherwise offers how he believes no such support exists. As well, he often cites how the forensic study
initiator, Beyond 37's Tod Swindell was not a certified forensic expert, so his 'Amelia to Irene opinion' should not be seriously
regarded. Mr. Swindell countered so much by remarking how the 'claim' of Amelia's ongoing survival as Irene preceded his involvement
by many years, and it was one among other Earhart claims he merely 'decided to look into' beginning back in 1996. He added
after realizing the claim had quite a substantial foundation, in 1997 he began studying the topic of human ID placement, and
consulting with and learning techniques from a variety of human identity experts, and even medical experts who influenced
the design of the Irene-Amelia comparison analysis. In other words, the approach taken to the analysis was anything but myopic.
It is equally worth noting; 'Dr.' Mandel is not a medical expert, nor is he a forensic human identity expert. He is however,
again, a loud protector of Amelia Earhart's status quo historical image.
Other
opposing Arguments Found On The Internet And Elsewhere....
Non-valid
statements are repeatedly offered about the Gervais-Irene claim. They're made by individuals who pressure the media and the
public into viewing Amelia's changed identity as either 'made up' or an outright impossibility, even though in real life it's
actually true. Notice though, how not one of them represents any form of a U. S. historical dictum guiding influence. Rather,
they are mere private individuals impaling their own 'cottage industry' opinions onto the story's less informed masses, in
order to keep the Irene-Amelia truth from being recognized and accepted.
It's
not so difficult for the objectively informed, to identify the private-sector steering committee long guiding public opinion
on this issue since the 1970s. For example, between 2002 and 2004 the newly discovered information about the long held Irene-Amelia
claim offered 'conclusive credence' to it, causing the network of anti 'Earhart survived' campaigners to re-emerge and once
again argue against it. Beyond the aforementioned Dr. Alex Mandel of the Ukraine, (who is discussed more further down) here
is a short-list of other 'media dominating' private citizen naysayers, along with noteworthy organizations who remain curiously
reserved, when asked to express their opinions on the Irene-Amelia debate:
Elgen
Long: Nauticos figurehead and crashed and sank theorist, who has argued against the Irene-Amelia claim since the 1970s.
Bill
Prymak: 1989 founding president of the Amelia Earhart Society. 'Has argued against the Irene-Amelia claim since the 1980s.
Richard Gillespie: Head of TIGHAR, (a historical aircraft recovery group)
has argued against the Irene-Amelia claim since the 1970s.
The
Smithsonian Air and Space Museum and the National Geographic Society: Both organizations have forever refused to openly participate
in the Irene-Amelia claim investigation, and favor the crashed and sank theory only.
The
families of Irene Craigmile and Amelia Earhart: The families have traditionally not participated in Earhart mystery solving
efforts, while also dismissing the Irene-Amelia claim out of hand before seriously addressing it.
The
99s and Zonta Clubs: Amelia had been a prominent member of both organizations. They've long refused to offer any insight or
serious commentary on the Irene-Amelia claim.
--------------------
It
is true how no official investigation into the 1937 disappearance case of Amelia Earhart has ever been launched. The United
States Government has traditionally maintained its silence about it, and as the Smithsonian is linked to representing U. S.
Government historical viewpoints, so too has it never been permitted to conduct its own investigation into Earhart's so called
'mystery.' Still, various individuals appear to represent a kind of 'official air' about themselves when discussing the Earhart
mystery, even though there is nothing official about them at all.
Before
citing any opinions from the above list, a brief question and answer session helps explain how American history facts are
recorded for posterity.
First, here's a quote about the
subject of 'history' itself made by 1920s & 30s Philosopher and Mathematician, Dr. Alfred North Whitehead. It was pulled
from his Yale and Harvard lectures from said era. It's simple, but worthy of consideration:
"History
is the expression of feelings peculiar to humanity." Alfred North Whitehead
Question: When it comes to how the recording of United States historical
facts is accomplished, and what new factual declarations actually make their way into academic textbooks, whom does the U.
S. public citizenry turn to?
Answer: The entities who control
the official endorsement of United States historical dictum record keeping.
Question:
Who are these "entities?"
Answer: There are many. Among
them is the Smithsonian Institute, The National Geographic Society, Ivy League and/or all college history professors, (who
conduct their own historical research studies to learn what they do, and then advance new important findings for approval)
and state, government, and national media influences just to name a few. Basically, in order to change the way an important
historical topic already exists as 'factually conveyed' in any academic text book, or almost any non-fiction book for that
matter... more than one of the above entities is almost always part of the influencing and approval process. Again, curiously...
although the Irene-Amelia conveyance is often referred to in non-fiction books and periodicals, nowhere has it ever been described
as something that was ever outright 'disproved.'
Question: Who are the main combatants
who most often raise their voices against the Irene-Amelia claim?
Answer:
They are private citizens only. For starters a good examination of the internet Wikipedia and Lost Flight of Amelia Earhart
false diatribes of Alex Mandel, and Amelia Earhart Society figureheads Ron Bright, Dave Horner, and Bill Prymak is recommended
as their efforts, carefully thought out and well written, still fall way short of conveying the forensic reality. Also, some
past offerings of TIGHAR President Richard Gillespie, and even some contradicting statements made from 2004 to 2006 by the
original Irene Craigmile’s own Son, Larry Heller among others are worth looking at. Not to mention Elgen Long, the crashed-and-sank
theorist and long time friend of Amelia's late Sister, Muriel Earhart Morrissey has been the one of the two main media-supported
theorists ever since the Gervais-Irene died in 1982. The other one to receive the most media attention since the early 1990s
is the TIGHAR club, that pretty much invented its 'desert island castaway' theory based on unsubstantiated data and
hearsay.
Of Interest...
One of the more noticeable things
about the Irene-Amelia conveyance, is how hard people in the private sector have campaigned against its acceptance EVER SINCE
it came into public view in 1970. Those who lead the charge seem to often come from the inner history realm, of long time
Amelia Earhart status-quo historical legacy supporters. The lot of them includes since the 1970s and 1980s, the names listed
above.
If one asks the Smithsonian Institute about Irene-Amelia, they will dismiss
the claim about her out of hand and support the crashed and sank theory only. As well, the National Geographic Society admits
how it is not allowed to state any mystery 'solving,' so when they report on the Irene-Amelia claim they can only downplay
it, or skirt the issue entirely. National Geographic answers to a higher call when it comes to historical subject matters
akin to the Earhart mystery nature; that of preferred U. S. historical dictum record keeping. Again, such a preference has
long dictated to leave the Earhart case existing as 'a mystery' only. For no 'official or semi-official' entity representing
the United States historical dictum viewpoint, has ever been 'officially' authorized or permitted to investigate the Earhart
case, in an effort to help advance the solving of the so-called 'mystery' attributed to it.
Sweeping
it under the rug...
AES founding President, Bill Prymak started the Amelia Earhart Society
in 1989 with a goal in mind: To gain Joe Gervais as its most revered member. Mr. Prymak would always include Joe Gervais on
AES trip invites, would often finance the participation endeavors of Gervais and his Wife Thelma, would honor Gervais ceremonially,
and he was always open to boast the treasure trove of Gervais research regarding Amelia Earhart... that his AES organization
gained access to by virtue of Joe Gervais agreeing to become an AES member. However, when it came to the most important research
issue to Joe Gervais concerning Earhart’s story… that being his 1965 discovery and later in-depth achieved awareness
of how Amelia survived and changed her name to ‘Irene,’ Mr. Prymak was always first to discourage other AES members
about it, and all but insist they not believe it.
So it is noticed once again for
review, how after Irene-Amelia died in 1982... and as the volumes of combined 1960s and 1970s research of Paul Briand, Joe
Gervais, and Fred Goerner were left to fade from memory, by the end of the 1980s three new media-touted entities had taken
over to dominate the Amelia Earhart research scene. They were:
(1.)
Amelia’s Sister Muriel’s friend in Elgen Long, who promoted the traditionally preferred by U. S. historical dictum
"crashed and sank" scenario.
(2.) Richard Gillespie’s
TIGHAR group who supported Earhart’s newly introduced "five hundred miles south of Howland Island, desert island
ditching and starvation" scenario.
(3.) Bill Prymak’s AES organization,
that quietly invited curious researchers to look into the "Marshall Islands, Japan rescue and/or imprisonment-demise
theory," while devoid of course, of endorsing Amelia's name-changed survival as Irene.
Curious,
even though all of the Irene-Amelia opposing theorists remained well aware of the Gervais ‘Irene-Amelia claim’
...along with the fact it had never been disproved… they still commonly and vehemently argued against it. And in recent
years, the mentioned 'post 2002 emergence' of Dr. Alex Mandel, the fairly unknown physicist from the Ukraine was hard not
to notice.
As discussed, Dr. Mandel knowingly miss-conveyed how the Irene Craigmile
Bolam who Joe Gervais met among other famous pilots in 1965... was proven 'not' to have been formerly known as Amelia Earhart.
In other words, he more or less lied about it. For such a thing was never forensically concluded by anyone. Yet Dr. Mandel
managed to influence Wikipedia into thinking it had been done. He did so by falsely asserting and influencing Ms. Gwen Gale
and others at Wikipedia into believing enough, how after thirty-six years of scholarly debate over the Major Joe Gervais 'Irene-Amelia'
claim, detective Kevin Richlin finally put an end to it all in a few short minutes. Again, said assertion was far from true.
Still, Wikipedia myopically bought into allowing Dr. Mandel's false Irene Craigmile Bolam depiction to advance it that way.
In
effect, Mandel's claim to Wikipedia of how Det. Kevin Richlin's limited and briefly expressed opinion brought an abrupt end
to the the thirty-six year old Irene-Amelia debate, was and remains an irresponsible overstatement.
On
the internet Dr. Mandel also relentlessly challenges writers of articles who demonstrate any support of, or curiosity towards
the Irene-Amelia claim. Again though, few in the world of Earhart research knew who Dr. Mandel was before the multiple-Irenes
discovery was made. He emerged from the Amelia Earhart mystery woodwork so to speak, specifically to combat the recently re-introduced
Gervais, Reineck, Swindell Irene-Amelia 'Forensic Conveyance.'
For
more information on the 'Irene-Amelia' impassioned rebuttals of Dr. Alex Mandel, on just about any search engine type in "Dr.
Alex Mandel, Bolam." You'll be amazed at what you find. For the last five years he has been curiously devoted to his
own mission for some reason, and worked hard to provide the false biography of Irene Craigmile Bolam that actually found its
way to be transcribed by Wikipedia.
As well AES lead men Ron Bright,
Dave Horner, and Bill Prymak additionally provided lengthy arguments to their AES followers, that went overboard with a purpose
of trying to persuade people not to believe in the Irene-Amelia conveyance.
Amy
Kleppner of course, Amelia’s living Niece always supported her Mother’s wish of endorsing Elgen Long’s efforts,
as passively does the Smithsonian Institute and the National Geographic Society. Almost curiously though, again, said two
institutions are not allowed to become directly involved in Earhart investigative research. Rather, they casually report on
what private researchers say about the Earhart mystery now and then.
Especially
after the 1997-2004 Forensic Analysis took place and concluded what it did about the Irene-Amelia conveyance, all of these
above listed adversaries of the long held Gervais Irene-Amelia claim came out of the woodwork and started fighting harder
against it. To the point of strongly influencing National Geographic into believing the study was nothing more than a slight
of hand hoax-like charade... that should not be taken seriously.
It was never advanced by Gervais
theory opponents, how the sponsor of the study, Tod Swindell had engaged the original Irene Craigmile’s Son, Larry Heller
by contract, after first making contact with him in 2004 and eventually enlisting his interest in an option arrangement.
Mr.
Swindell taped his 2004 phone conversations with Larry Heller that ultimately led to the contractual agreement between them,
with ten thousand dollars paid in 2006 to option Mr. Heller’s version of his Mother’s life story. The decision
was made to do such a thing, because in 2004 Mr. Heller admitted in conversation how he was aware of more than one woman having
been identified as his Mother in the 1982 Woodbridge, New Jersey News Tribune, via the series that profiled his Mother’s
life story juxtaposed to Amelia Earhart's. In the recorded phone conversation, Heller and Swindell are heard discussing the
issue of the woman in the 1982 series who was not the same Irene Craigmile Bolam who Joe Gervais met and photographed in 1965.
To Swindell's question, “Do you know who the other woman was?” Mr. Heller replies, “I can’t tell you
her name, but I will advise her of this phone call.”
Mr. Heller’s reply conveyed
two things: (1.) Mr. Heller was aware of how the 1982 Tribune series featured more than one woman identified as his mother,
and (2.) He knew the other woman, was aware she was still living, and he was in touch with her. As well though, Mr.
Heller would not share any ‘who and where’ information about her.
Mr.
Heller was not expecting Mr. Swindell’s call and began the first conversation by asking him “How did you get my
number?” Mr. Heller also explained how he was in the middle of a garage sale at his Huntington, Long Island home
that he would soon be moving from, and he asked to be called back, which Mr. Swindell did. Then, they spoke more at length.
Swindell is heard advising Mr. Heller of the forensic study results, and of the new book out by Rollin Reineck that regarded
Mr. Heller’s Mother’s curious life story. Mr. Heller interrupted the conversation early on to stress how he was
not the Son of Amelia Earhart, and how he would “take a DNA test to prove it.” Mr. Swindell replied how he already
knew Mr. Heller was the Son of the original Irene Craigmile, not of Amelia Earhart.
After
learning of such a contact with Mr. Heller, AES President Bill Prymak became noticeably upset. By the following year he had
encouraged an AES cohort of his, one Dave Horner to contact Mr. Heller as well. During Mr. Horner's interview with him, Mr.
Heller denied there was anything malevolent or suspicious about his mother’s past. Ultimately, this shows how closely
guarded the Irene-Amelia story has always been, and how whenever a significant advancement was made on it, adversaries swiftly
arose to defile them with broad strokes.
A final example of turnabout can be found in the 2006 recorded conversation
that took place at Mr. Heller’s Manhattan Attorney’s office. On tape Mr. Swindell is heard reminding Mr. Heller
of their 2004 conversation, and how Mr. Heller acknowledged that he knew more than one woman was identified as his Mother
in the 1982 Tribune series. To such a comment Mr. Heller can be heard loudly retorting, “No!” almost before Mr.
Swindell finished making his remark. Of course, this was just moments after he acknowledged the 'early 1940s family identified
Irene Craigmile' only, as the 'Mother' he recalled from his early childhood, while adding he'd "never seen" the
1945 Zonta photo bearing the likeness of the '1945-1982 identified Gervais-Irene,' who Joe Gervais met and photographed in
1965. In any case, it all ended with a paid-dearly-for signed contract with Larry Heller, along with the issue concerning
his lack-of-ease when discussing his mother's 'plural identity' equation.
Curious
as well… in late 2002 Bill Prymak had been one of the original recipients of the preliminary forensic study-analysis
that was co-sponsored, co-orchestrated, and mostly conducted at that time by Mr. Swindell. After a month of evaluating the
study, here is a reproduced excerpt from the reply Bill Prymak sent to Tod Swindell about the study's initial results, that
included the discovery of more that one identified Irene Craigmile Bolam:
“Tod,
this is your creation, nobody else’s. My personal feelings… stay the course… your current product will
not diminish by protecting it, for the moment, from the tumultuous events certain to befall you if you go public… nourish
your product, refine it, let’s meet in Vegas… (soon!!)”
[NOTE:
This was already five years after Mr. Swindell had been sharing his Irene-Amelia forensic study offerings that included her
image and handwriting. The reference to the specific ‘creation’ Prymak refers to, is the plural Irene Craigmile
Bolams discovery in the photographed life-history of her person. Gene Tissot, whose comments can be read in the Testimonials
link, refers to the same discovery. Tissot and Reineck had received duplicates of the same study Bill Prymak did.]
Bill
Prymak continued: “Public acceptance of your work at this time may be tenuous. Wait until you can strengthen your position….
I believe in you… Rollin believes in you… we have to get the rest of the world to believe in you… so
mature your product towards this goal… Bill"
No
doubt, Bill Prymak was doing his best to persuade Mr. Swindell not to 'go public' with his study results. And after
replying this way, by early 2003 Bill Prymak had launched a campaign of silence and disregard towards what the study results
conveyed. He refused to share or endorse the results to other AES members, and by 2004 he was describing Mr. Swindell to other
Amelia Earhart researchers as a person of a 'questionable reputation.' He ceased communicating with Mr. Swindell, and by 2006
he had influenced the National Geographic Society’s program to not display the 2002 discovery of the plural Irene Craigmile
Bolams, while endorsing the engagement of the less research informed police forensic detective, Kevin Richlin.
Today,
at the various internet locations one can read the overboard persuasive and lengthy commentaries focused solely on trying
to convince people, to never take the Irene-Amelia claim seriously, and to make sure the Beyond 37' forensic study results
are only described as lacking credibility as linked to the efforts of Amelia Earhart researchers Gervais, Reineck, and Swindell.
About
Wikipedia’s falsely portrayed “Irene Craigmile Bolam” biography, (go to Wikipedia and type in ‘Irene
Craigmile Bolam’) see the Mandel-Prymak influenced life story account of Irene Craigmile Bolam posted after the National
Geographic Special the two influenced aired. Realize at the same time however, within the context of the false Wikipedia biography
of Irene Craigmile Bolam, you’re also looking at a nice photo of the former Amelia Earhart.
(To
hide something valuable, place it right under people's noses.)
For the “The Lost Flight
Of Amelia Earhart” motion picture project and anti Gervais, Reineck, Swindell tirade essays... Google “The Lost
Flight of Amelia Earhart” and “Irene Bolam” with “Mandel.” This was also provided by AES President
Prymak and Alex Mandel, Pat Gaston, and Dave Hoerner.
As far as the long time steering
of historical misconception goes, and the long term anti Irene-Amelia fulminations of Bill Prymak, Richard Gillespie and a
few of their sedulous devotees found on the internet…. there’s plenty of this kind of thing out there. Feel free
to take a look, although realize as well, how conveying the real historical truth about the Gervais-Irene appears to go against
the grain of their shared objective.
|
