|
May 2013
Reviewing the Historical Controversy of Amelia Earhart
Featuring
the Combined Research of World War Two History Scholars
and Authors to include Randall Brink, Fred
Goerner, Vincent Loomis, Joe Gervais, Rollin Reineck, and many more... 'Exploring the realities of Amelia Earhart's, Fred Noonan's, and the original Irene Craigmile's disappearances.'
Site Meter:
3,175,112
|

|

RECALL HOW ON THE MORNING OF
JULY 2, 1937 Amelia Earhart sent her last 'officially recognized' radio message as she and Fred Noonan continued to fly safely over the Pacific Ocean. Their
fuel supply remained ample; the leg to Howland Island from New Guinea was a 2,550 mile flight with
their Lockheed Electra 10E airplane featuring a distance range of 4,500 miles.
Their last believed coordinates were described as 'Near The Equator In The Vicinity Northwest Of Howland Island, Well
Below The Gilbert Islands And The Marshall Islands.' Besides not being able to locate Howland--a tiny island amid the vast ocean expanse--they never reported any trouble flying. While still in the U. S. before
she began her journey, Earhart mentioned to Gene Vidal
that if she and Noonan had trouble locating Howland she would reserve enough fuel
to head back to the Gilbert-Marshalls archipilago. (continued further down)
|
| U. N. Marshall Islands Ambassador, Alfred Capelle |

|
| Called it 'true unrecognized history' that Amelia Earhart came to the Marshall Islands in 1937. |
|
| U. S. Navy Admiral Chester Nimitz |

|
| Said it was "known and documented in Washington" that Earhart ended up in the Marshall Islands. |
|
| Monsignor James Francis Kelley of Seton Hall |

|
| In the 1980s he first admitted to aiding Earhart's 'private' continued survival. |
|
|

|
A U. S. 0-2 INTELLIGENCE REPORT DATED
NOVEMBER, 1938 described how after her last publicly relayed message was heard, "She (Amelia)
stated she was turning north, and they (Earhart and Noonan) continued to be heard at intervals."
The report also mentioned that "Her signals became fainter as she continued
to head north until they were no longer received." For three days Pan Am's Makapu Point station in Hawaii recorded follow up radio transmissions determined to have likely been from Earhart. A degree of error bearing correction from the Coast Guard Cutter Itasca to Makapu
showed the signals eminated from the region of the lower Marshall Islands. To date
however, no Earhart radio messages besides those from the Coast Guard Cutter Itasca's log that cut-off
while Earhart was still approaching Howland Island on July 2, 1937,
were ever 'authenticated' as Earhart's.
The Itasca's radio log had been oddly withheld
from the public by FDR Cabinet member, Henry P. Morgenthau Jr.
until July of 1938. Before he released it, in May of 1938 Morgenthau had sent a response to First Lady, Eleanor Roosevelt [scroll further down to
see excerpt] displaying
his reluctance to make the final report on Earhart's last flight public,
especially where it concerned a choice Earhart made that was "against all
orders" and how releasing the complete final report stood to "ruin" her
reputation. (continued further down)
|
Below: From the time she was reported missing
Amelia Earhart's image required White House protection. This reply to a query made by
First Lady, Eleanor Roosevelt nine months after Amelia
Earhart and Fred Noonan were declared 'missing persons' reveals the protective
stance the White House adhered to.

In May of 1938 Eleanor Roosevelt's personal secretary,
Malvina Scheider delivered the above message to the First Lady in response to her query on behalf of Paul Mantz,
who wished to know why the White House refused to release its withheld 'official report' on Amelia
Earhart's July 1937 disappearance. FDR's Cabinet member Henry P. Morgenthau Jr. is referenced in the
above note. (See his photo and another transcript further below.) Although it is clear the
White House knew information about Earhart's final disposition that the public remained unaware of, it
never officially commented on why it refused to share
the knowledge it maintained on what actually became of
the famous pilot and her navigator.
Below, Center: In 1987 a Marshall Islands commemorative postage stamp marked
the 50th anniversary of Amelia Earhart's arrival there at Mili Atoll:
| U. N. Marshall Islands Ambassador, Alfred Capelle |

|
| In 2002 he affirmed to Ron Staton of the Associated Press: Earhart definitely came to the Marshall's |
|
Note: The U.
S. National Press circuit did not pick up on it, but in 1987 the Marshall
Islands commemorated the 50th Anniversary of the 1937 rescue of Earhart and Noonan and the recovery
of their plane with an impressive series of postage stamps. Below see an example
from the series:
| A 1987 Marshall Islands Commemorative Stamp... |

|
| ...plane hoisted, Japan naval officer with Noonan and Earhart. "Picked up, not captured." |
|
| 2002 Article by Associated Press's Ron Staton |

|
| Staton interviewed Capelle at an Earhart Research Symposium |
|
|

|
TODAY, MARSHALL ISLANDS GOVERNMENT
OFFICIALS still openly describe just as they always have,
how Amelia Earhart's arrival at the Marshall Islands in 1937 when it was under Japan's authority, is legitimate history.
They also feel the protection of Earhart's legacy and national pride has long
disallowed such a truth to be endorsed to the American
public. This left the Earhart case an open playing field.
There is no doubt Earhart ended her flight in Japan's pre-war Imperial Mandate Islands, and that she
visited Japan governed Saipan as well, although there was never any solid
conveyance of Amelia Earhart's or Fred Noonan's death taking place while they
were in Japan's care. Still, by the 1960s many Americans
had been encouraged to believe that Earhart had either died
of an illness Japan neglected, or from something more ridiculously macabre; Japan's outright executions
of both Earhart and Noonan. Decades later, completely
out of the blue and with no historical foundation for doing so, the U. S. Navy started showing support
of an idea expressing how Earhart and Noonan flew so far off course they ended up hundreds of miles south of the equator on
a desert island where they lived like Robinson Crusoe--until they died of hunger and dehydration. No evidence
was ever found to authenticate the innocent suggestion, of course. In the meantime, any mention that
the duo may have somehow privately survived was always
quickly dismissed out of hand by Amelia Earhart's and Irene Craigmile's families,
and automatically ignored by official U. S. history.
Recall as well, there never was an 'official investigation' launched into the
1937 'disappearance' of Earhart and Noonan. Note: In 1960 Amelia Earhart
would have only been sixty-three years old.
|
What's New? Here are some excerpts taken from recent articles published in Variety and elsewhere: February 22, 2013:
Below find recent Earhart search news found in articles by Variety's Alexie Villegas Zotomayer & news reporter Haidee
V. Eugenio Eyewitness Accounts State Earhart Made It To Saipan; Claimed She Initially Went Down In The Marshall Islands eyewitness accounts are pouring in on WWII sightings of American aviatrix
Amelia Earhart and her navigator Fred Noonan on Saipan, permits, however, have
yet to be issued to allow the researchers to dig at Naftan Point and at two former As Lito airfield sites. Aircraft Recovery Associates, composed
of veteran filmmakers, researchers and Earhart enthusiasts have been on Saipan since January; however, they continue to
wait for the release of the permits that will allow them to conduct digs and to gather evidence to support their hypothesis
about Earhart’s disappearance in 1937.  Amelia Earhart | Lead investigator Michael Harris, and recovery specialists Richard Martini and Captain Paul H. Cooper have been on
Saipan for several weeks now exploring the hypothesis that Amelia Earhart was taken to Saipan, incarcerated and died here.
- See more at: http://www.mvariety.com/cnmi/cnmi-news/local/53805-earhart-research-awaits-release-of-permits?tmpl=component&layout=default&page=#sthash.RKRn6oZH.dpuf eyewitness accounts are pouring in on WWII sightings
of American aviatrix Amelia Earhart and her navigator Fred Noonan on Saipan, permits,
however, have yet to be issued to allow the researchers to dig at Naftan Point and at two former As Lito airfield sites. Aircraft Recovery
Associates, composed of veteran filmmakers, researchers and Earhart enthusiasts have been on Saipan since January; however,
they continue to wait for the release of the permits that will allow them to conduct digs and to gather evidence to support
their hypothesis about Earhart’s disappearance in 1937.  Amelia Earhart | Lead investigator Michael Harris, and recovery specialists Richard Martini and Captain Paul H. Cooper have been on
Saipan for several weeks now exploring the hypothesis that Amelia Earhart was taken to Saipan, incarcerated and died here.
- See more at: http://www.mvariety.com/cnmi/cnmi-news/local/53805-earhart-research-awaits-release-of-permits?tmpl=component&layout=default&page=#sthash.RKRn6oZH.dpuf eyewitness accounts are pouring in on WWII sightings
of American aviatrix Amelia Earhart and her navigator Fred Noonan on Saipan, permits,
however, have yet to be issued to allow the researchers to dig at Naftan Point and at two former As Lito airfield sites. Aircraft Recovery
Associates, composed of veteran filmmakers, researchers and Earhart enthusiasts have been on Saipan since January; however,
they continue to wait for the release of the permits that will allow them to conduct digs and to gather evidence to support
their hypothesis about Earhart’s disappearance in 1937.  Amelia Earhart | Lead investigator Michael Harris, and recovery specialists Richard Martini and Captain Paul H. Cooper have been on
Saipan for several weeks now exploring the hypothesis that Amelia Earhart was taken to Saipan, incarcerated and died here.
- See more at: http://www.mvariety.com/cnmi/cnmi-news/local/53805-earhart-research-awaits-release-of-permits?tmpl=component&layout=default&page=#sthash.RKRn6oZH.dpuf eyewitness accounts are pouring in on WWII sightings
of American aviatrix Amelia Earhart and her navigator Fred Noonan on Saipan, permits,
however, have yet to be issued to allow the researchers to dig at Naftan Point and at two former As Lito airfield sites. Aircraft Recovery
Associates, composed of veteran filmmakers, researchers and Earhart enthusiasts have been on Saipan since January; however,
they continue to wait for the release of the permits that will allow them to conduct digs and to gather evidence to support
their hypothesis about Earhart’s disappearance in 1937. - See more at: http://www.mvariety.com/cnmi/cnmi-news/local/53805-earhart-research-awaits-release-of-permits?tmpl=component&layout=default&page=#sthash.RKRn6oZH.dpuf Many documented eyewitness accounts have recently been gathered concerning WWII era
sightings of American aviatrix, Amelia Earhart and her navigator, Fred Noonan on Saipan. Now, a group of experts
feel they are getting close to laying to rest the 76-year mystery of the disappearance of legendary
aviatrix. That is what U.S. based film director, producer, screenwriter, and freelance
journalist Richard Martini, famed aircraft recovery lead investigator Michael Harris, and aircraft recovery specialist Capt.
Paul H. Cooper are trying to do in their ongoing research on Saipan. The
investigators and many others, to include well known 1960s
CBS radio journalist, Fred Goerner and a plethora of past and present
Saipanese and Marshall Islands government officials, insist Earhart went down at Mili Atoll of the Marshall
Islands and soon after travelled to Saipan while the pre-war era American public remained 'unaware' of such a reality.
Note: Pertaining to the above, Amelia Earhart no-doubt
visited Saipan while it was under Japan's authority, although it remains highly doubtful she died there or was ever held
there by Japan against her will.
About the images
below: Rumors to the contrary notwithstanding,
no 'forensics expert' has ever concluded that Amelia Earhart
did not live to become one of the three individuals who were identified as one-in-the-same
'Irene Craigmile Bolam.' Wikipedia has that wrong, and so does anyone who
cites Wikipedia.
Several years ago
the National Geographic Channel did engage forensic detective, Kevin Richlin to
evaluate some photo evidence. Richlin avowed that the show's producers did
not provide him with enough photo data or other information to allow a thorough analysis, leaving him unable to fully support or fully deny the conveyance
of Earhart's post-loss survival with a new identity. This website tells
and displays the rest of the story.
The vast amount of information accumulated since
the 1960s that led to this ongoing historical controversy speaks for itself, to include how the forensic
analysis and family testimony confirmed there were actually
three different women who were historically attributed to the same 'Irene Craigmile Bolam' identity:
| |
|
|
|
| Orville Wright & Amelia Earhart |

|
|
| Below: Gervais-Irene & Amelia superimposed: |

|
| A head to toe match, character traits too, including handwriting. (See below.) |
|
|
The 'Gervais-Irene'
who died in 1982, was nicknamed for
retired Air Force Major, Joe Gervais. Major Gervais had spent years studying
Earhart's disappearance before he met her in 1965 among other well
known retired aviators, and he found
her superior knowledge of aviation history and her described 'past close friendship' to Amelia Earhart
curious in an odd, if not highly familiar way.
| Amelia Earhart, age thirty in 1928. |

|
| Photo taken after her Friendship flight. |
|
| Equally blended... |

|
| ...Amelia at age 30 and the Gervais-Irene Craigmile Bolam. |
|
| From a 1963 photo taken in Japan... |

|
| ...the Gervais-Irene Craigmile Bolam, known as 'Irene' from the mid-1940s until her passing in 1982. |
|
| |
|
|
| Gervais-Irene's handwriting compared to Amelia's: |

|
| From a 1967 letter she sent to Joe Gervais, with Amelia's own "Amelia M Earhart" signature added. |
Above: A Gervais-Irene
to Amelia Earhart handwriting comparison, with the Gervais-Irene veritably admitting she was 'known' as both Irene
and Amelia. Excerpted from a 1967 letter to Joe Gervais, she referred
to two individuals; famous pilot Viola Gentry, and Early Birds of Aviation President Elmo Pickerill, writing, "because they each knew us both well as Amelia Earhart and Irene Craigmile." Notice how Amelia's
'Amelia M. Earhart' signature lines
up with the Gervais-Irene's.
| USN Admiral Chester Arthur Nimitz |

|
| Commander of the Pacific Fleet during World War Two |
In 1965, former World War Two Pacific Fleet Commander, Admiral Chester Nimitz admitted
his own awareness of Earhart's
continued survival after her described
'disappearance' to CBS Radio Journalist, Fred Goerner who was investigating the case:
1965 Nimitz Quote: "Amelia Earhart and her navigator did go down in the Marshall Islands and were picked up by the Japanese." After the U. S. occupied the Marshalls
in 1944, liberating it from Japan, Admiral Nimitz was put in charge there. Admiral Nimitz also mentioned to Goerner how such
a truth about Earhart was long ago "known and documented in Washington."
[Note: Admiral Nimitz assisted Fred Goerner with his 1960s investigative journalism quest that peered into
the controversial non-reported details of Earhart's last flight.] Admiral Nimitz also knew Monsignor James Francis
Kelley. (See photo of the two further down.)
| From a 10/18/82 New Jersey News Tribune article: |

|
| Msgr. Kelley later verified his late friend, Irene Bolam used to be known as 'Amelia Earhart.' |
|
| Photo of Msgr. Kelley from his autobiography. |

|
| Past Seton Hall President, Msgr. James F. Kelley knew both Lindbergh and Earhart. |
|
Below: Excerpt
from retired USAF Colonel Rollin C. Reineck's 1991 taped interview with
Monsignor James Francis Kelley. (See more recorded interview excerpts in the 'Miscellaneous' link.)
Reineck:
Are you aware that she was Irene Bolam? Kelley: What? Reineck: Amelia Earhart was Irene Bolam? Kelley: That's right, yes.
| |
| The Original Irene O'Crowley Craigmile, 1930. |

|
| Amelia's 'pal' with her husband Charles Craigmile & her father Joe O'Crowley. Charles died in 1931. |
In the early 1930s, Irene O'Crowley Craigmile was Amelia
Earhart's friend and 'flying pal.' In 2006 the 1934 born son of Irene O'Crowley Craigmile spoke of the good friendship that had existed
between Amelia Earhart and his mother's family, the O'Crowleys of Newark, New Jersey.
The friendship started in 1928 when Amelia met his mother's aunt, Attorney Irene Mary Rutherford O'Crowley who was a charter ZONTA club member along with well known
publicist, Nina Price. Attorney Irene and Ms. Price grew to be close friends with
Amelia, (Amelia also joined the ZONTAs after she became famous)
and they were contract advisors and promoters of the famous Amelia Earhart
signature luggage line. (Into the 1960s Amelia Earhart Luggage was still headquartered
in Newark.) Irene O'Crowley Craigmile's son identified the young looking woman (ID'd above as the 'third' Irene Craigmile)
as his early childhood mother, who was not the original Irene O'Crowley Craigmile (his true birth mother, shown above in 1930) nor was she the Gervais-Irene, whose enigmatic quality
and importance among her peers was well-noticed in 1965 by retired USAF Major
Joe Gervais, after he was introduced
to her by Amelia's old friend, Viola Gentry. A forensic
analysis revealed that the original Irene O'Crowley Craigmile
no longer existed beyond the mid-1930s, approximate to just after the time of her son's birth. It is
true today, beyond the limited information one hears or reads; what became of
the original Irene O'Crowley Craigmile after 1934 remains a mystery unto itself, and the Gervais-Irene who was identified
nowhere as 'Irene' prior to the 1940s, did share a head to toe congruence with Amelia
Earhart.
Note: Further down see
more photos and information about Monsignor James Francis Kelley and his long time friendship with the Gervais-Irene O'Crowley Craigmile Bolam.
|
|
"Amelia Earhart survived
and she eventually returned to the United States. There's no doubt about it anymore." USAF Colonel Rollin C. Reineck
(Ret.), from an interview with the National Geographic Society, 2007.
| 1966 Doubleday book by CBS Radio's Fred Goerner... |

|
| A top ten New York Times 'Best Seller,' years later 'official silence' left few recalling it. |
|
How Amelia Earhart's 'Disappearance
Controversy' Re-Surfaced In The 1960s These two great investigative books from 1966 and 1970 combined for over fifteen years of documented research. They clearly revealed how in 1937 the United States and Japan chose not to publicly disclose an awareness they shared on what became of Amelia Earhart and
her navigator, Fred Noonan. The books' authors along with other private
investigators who
inquired about the overwhelming amount of indisputable evidence
they discovered, were greeted with official silence in Washington and
Tokyo when they pressed for more information. Eventually most all gave up on trying to get an official response. Still, by the mid-1970s it had become clear
in a forensic way that Amelia Earhart and Fred Noonan did not just crash and sink, nor did they disappear from the face of
the earth, nor did they die of sickness on Saipan, nor were they executed by Japan for spying, nor did they perish on a remote desert island hundreds of miles south of the equator. A purpose
was served though, for the introductions of these and other suggestions about
the duo's final fate helped keep the 'mystery' idea going. Today those
most keenly aware of the Earhart disappearance saga accept the reality of the duo having survived well beyond
the date of their so-called disappearance under the auspice of Japan, while understanding
the general public was just never clued in about it.
|
| 1970 McGraw-Hill book by Joe Klaas w/Joe Gervais |

|
| A best seller, later unjustifiably ridiculed, it first pontificated Amelia 'privately survived.' |
|
"It's hard for most people to
comprehend, by the 1960s she barely recognized herself for who she used to be." Monsignor James Francis Kelley (1902-1996) describing his late 'close friend'
Irene Bolam to Rockford, Illinois TV reporter, Dean Magley in 1987. In 1991 Father Kelley
also confirmed to retired Air Force Colonel, Rollin Reineck how
his late friend, Irene (the 'Gervais-Irene' who died in 1982) was previously known as
'Amelia Earhart.' (See more about Monsignor Kelley and his long time friendship with the Gervais-Irene further down.)
| Amelia Earhart, age 26, before she became famous. |

|
Below: In 1965 retired USAF Major, Joe Gervais met one of the three women identified as Irene Craigmile Bolam.
He studied
her background thoroughly in subsequent years, and maintained evermore
how she had previously been known as Amelia Earhart. It wasn't until the forensic study separated
the Irenes, and further displayed the physical and character trait congruencies that the Irene he met and Amelia so obviously
shared, that people finally started to catch up to the
historical reality of it all.
| WWII hero & retired USAF Major Joe Gervais... |

|
| ...in 1983 on his way to Howland Island. Amelia never made there in 1937. |
"Monsignor Kelley was very
lucid when he described Earhart's survival to the people he did.
People will try to tell you that he was lying, senile, or just
plain crazy, but that wasn't true at all. You will also hear important sounding people tell you the Irene-Amelia equation isn't
true. Well, it is true." A 2001 quote from retired
USAF Major Joe Gervais (1924-2005).
"Amelia
Earhart definitely came to the Marshall Islands in 1937."
The
above was described in 2002 to Associated Press reporter Ron Staton
by Alfred Capelle, United Nations Ambassador to the Marshall Islands. Prior to
the time the U. S. occupied it in 1944, Japan had been the ruling government authority in the Marshalls. Based on his country's own history of the time period, Ambassador Capelle
believed Earhart's stay there was non-public information
because it was so significant, and that she had even
ended up testing equipment there for Japan's Naval Authority.
"Numerous investigations foundered on official silence in Tokyo and
Washington, leaving the fate of Amelia Earhart an everlasting mystery."
From Marylin Bender & Selig Altschull's Pan Am aviation history book, The Chosen Instrument, 1982, Simon & Schuster. Note: 'Official silence' created the 'mystery' of Amelia Earhart.
"Where history treated Amelia
Earhart unfairly, it is mainly because a difference existed between what the public thought it understood
compared to what it did not recall about her, especially during the time of her last flight. For one,
Amelia was an anti-war pacifist who was not affected by the growing negative feelings toward Japan in 1937, four years before
Pearl Harbor happened. She adhered to an isolationist stance as war approached,
and during her last flight she wrote favorably of all nations she encountered.
Amelia also spoke several languages to include Japanese, she adored Japan's culture, and she was a hero there in the 1930s
just as Babe Ruth had been. She always chose to do things her own way,
and in effect, when the Sino-Japanese war broke out on July 7, 1937, only five days after she was declared a missing
person, she was pretty much gone forever right then." Beyond 37'
"We fancy ourselves as concrete things, something
with boundaries, unchanging, and when we have occasion to refer to ourselves or examine ourselves introspectively, we believe
we know what we refer to and are adamant in our avowal of self. The truth is we neither know ourselves nor are we the same
from one moment in our lives to the next. If we think of ourselves as bodies, our changing self becomes apparent. It is nearly
impossible even for families to recognize a loved one after thirty years of absence, so greatly has the self altered. And
a little reflection upon the changing quality of consciousness is sure to give us some insight into the numberless selves
our surface minds and egos have become since first appearing in the world." Uell Stanley Andersen (1917-1986)
| Monsignor Kelley & friend Irene in 1980 |

|
| Kelley eventually admitted she acquired the original Irene's identity in the 1940s. |
Legendary Seton Hall University
President, Monsignor James Francis Kelley lived near and was a friend of the original Irene Craigmile's prominent O'Crowley
family of Newark, New Jersey. He especially knew Dr. Clarence Rutherford
O'Crowley and his sister, Attorney Irene Mary Rutherford O'Crowley who were the
original Irene Craigmile's Uncle and Aunt. In the 1930s Monsignor Kelley
also knew Charles Lindbergh of Hopewell, New Jersey and he knew Amelia Earhart, who primarily resided in Rye, New York from 1931 to 1935. Read about Amelia Earhart's connection
to the O'Crowley family directly below:
| From FDR's Cabinet, Henry P. Morgenthau Jr. |

|
| His duties well exceeded his job description. |
"I know how Amelia Earhart absolutely disregarded all orders, and if we ever release this thing, goodbye Amelia
Earhart's reputation." 1938 quote from FDR Presidential Cabinet Member, Henry
P. Morgenthau, Jr. in response to First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt's query on why the White House refused to release the 'official'
report on Earhart's 1937 disappearance. (See two original transcript excerpts further down.) Steadfastly ignored by official
history, yet supported by statements made later by Admiral Chester Nimitz and Ambassador Alfred Capelle of the Marshall Islands,
Amelia headed for Japan's Imperial Mandate Islands, and she "disregarded all orders" by doing so.
Below:
Here are two excerpts from Morgenthau's original May 13, 1938 transcripted response to First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt's
request for the 'White House Official Report' on the disappearance of Amelia Earhart. The White House never commented further
beyond this document, that was no doubt intended to remain privately archived.
| 1938 White House transcript continued from above: |

|
| The lack of a "proper search" referenced the U. S. never searching the Marshalls. |
| From Morgenthau's conversation... |

|
| ...with the First Lady's secretary Malvina Scheider about the withheld Earhart disappearance report. |
Note: Henry Morgenthau
Jr. actually ended his conversation with Malvina Scheider by suggesting she "make something up" to appease the First
Lady's request. (In the follow up note at the top of the Home Page one can see her reply was more straight forward.) He also
professed to know what really happened at the end of Earhart's flight, with his assistant, Stephen Gibbon adding there was
'evidence' opposing the need for additional searching. It is apparent throughout the content of this message the White House
wished for the public to accept Amelia Earhart as 'gone forever.' It never admitted so much, but it seemed to wish for the
public to regard the conclusion of the Earhart saga, as if Amelia had died. Twenty years later, in the late 1950s an overwhelming
preponderence of circumstantial evidence surfaced describing how Amelia ended up existing under the auspice of Japan prior
to the outbreak of World War Two. To this day neither the White House nor Japan has ever issued a statement refuting this
suggestion as Earhart's ultimate post-loss reality.
What Many Researchers Mistakenly Assumed:
The majority
of serious Earhart disappearance investigators always agreed that Mili
Atoll of the lower Marshall Islands was where Amelia
Earhart and Fred Noonan went down and were rescued by Japan's Naval
Authority. Japan never denied that the two had existed under its auspice in the
Marshalls, but it did deny holding them captive against their will, and it denied any
suggestion of either of the two having died while in their care.
Still, a common thread grew to exist where many researchers mistakenly assumed that Earhart and Noonan must have died subsequent to the ending of their
last flight in the broad circle of the Pacific Islands region they last flew in. 1.) Researcher Richard Gillespie would have people believe they died on the island of
Nikamororo of hunger and dehydration after they went down there. The trouble
is there has never been any credible evidence introduced that supports such a claim. 2.) CBS Radio Journalist, Fred Goerner asserted
the duo went down on Mili Atoll and later died on Saipan; Earhart of dysentery and Noonan at the hands
of a Japanese jail guard. Yet, no hard evidence supported Goerner's
'how they died' theory either. 3.) Researcher Mike Campbell and Amelia Earhart Society
President, Bill Prymak stressed their beliefs that Thomas Devine was right about Earhart having been
executed on Saipan, but no hard evidence supported their claim either, and again, Japan outright denied ever harming Earhart. 4.) Researcher Elgen Long
claimed Earhart and Noonan simply crashed at sea and drowned near Howland Island, although few people agreed with him after they weighed the
overwhelming preponderance of evidence that clearly contradicted
his hypothesis. Where official history never formally addressed it, and the above private researchers
all professed Earhart's continued survival to be untrue
even though it was never proven untrue, the following question remained to be asked: Was
it possible Amelia Earhart could have survived her disappearance, and then quietly continued to exist without
public awareness?
Decades ago,
researchers began unearthing the realities of Amelia Earhart's 1937 disappearance, leaving most all
of them to believe that without public awareness she had continued to survive well beyond the date of her disappearance.
| CBS Radio Journalist, Fred Goerner's 1966 book... |

|
| A New York Times 'Best Seller,' ascertained Earhart 'quietly' ended up under Japan's auspice, |
|
| The 1970 Joe Klaas, Joe Gervais book... |

|
| ...A New York Times best seller, avowed Amelia 'privately' survived with Japan & U.S. help. |
|
| By Robert Myers & Barbara Wiley, 1985 |

|
| A first hand account; avowed Joe Gervais was right about the 'Irene' he met in 1965. |
|
| Randall Brink's 1994 'Best Seller'... |

|
| Brink collaborated with Gervais & was invited to Irene's 1982 Memorial Dinner. |
|
| By Colonel Rollin Reineck, 2004 |

|
| First displayed Beyond 37's study results, stated the Gervais-Irene was 'formerly Earhart.' |
|
| By David Bowman, 2005 |

|
| Beyond 37' overlay on the cover, it focused mainly on the Irene-Amelia controversy. |
|
In the 1960s and 1970s much controversial
information about Amelia Earhart's post-disappearance existence
was discovered and revealed. In subsequent years more substantiated
accounts about the famous pilot's quiet survival kept surfacing, to include that of former Seton Hall University President, Monsignor James Francis Kelley:
| Monsignor Kelley with N.J. Gov. Byrne and his wife |

|
| ...and baseball Commissioner Bowie Kuhn and his wife, and Sandy Palmer. |
Who was Monsignor James Francis
Kelley, and what did he ultimately convey
to people about his long time friend, Irene Bolam?
Monsignor James Francis Kelley (1902-1996) was President of Seton Hall
University in New Jersey from 1936 to 1949. He had many famous friends in government,
politics, show business, and of course among high priests of the Catholic Church,
to include having hosted Pope Paul VI as his
overnight house guest in 1965, when the beloved Pontiff became the first Pope ever to visit the United States. In the mid-1980s Monsignor Kelley began to more significantly brake his silence about his late close friend,
Irene Bolam. This included Kelley's 1991
statement to USAF Col. Rollin C. Reineck, "After all she'd been through, she didn't want
to be Amelia Earhart any more." [AKA
'the Gervais-Irene' specifically. Note: According to record
there were three different women attributed to the same 'Irene Craigmile Bolam' identity.
Monsignor Kelley was known for his friendship to the 'Gervais-Irene Bolam' only.] Kelley also described his involvement with Cardinal Francis Spellman and Jackie
Cochran in bringing Amelia home as the war ended, and the endorsement of her changed
identity. See the Amelia Earhart Miscellaneous link on the upper left for more on Monsignor Kelley's
and Irene Bolam's long time friendship. Kelley outright affirmed in a taped interview that his late friend, Irene was the woman 'previously known
as Amelia Earhart.' In 1988, Astronaut Wally Schirra also mentioned to a Detroit TV news reporter named Dean Magley,
that he had met the woman previously known as Amelia Earhart at NASA in 1979. Below: Monsignor Kelley avowed the Gervais-Irene
was originally someone else....
| Monsignor Kelley & Pope Paul VI at the Vatican, |

|
| during a 1960s visit. Janey Blaylock is also in the photo. |
| Monsignor Kelley & his friend, Irene Bolam in 1980 |

|
| Kelley described how she had used the original Irene's identity from the 1940s to 1982. |
|
| Admiral Nimitz and Senator Al Hawkes... |

|
| ...receiving honorary Seton Hall degrees from Monsignor Kelley; |
| Monsignor Kelley shown in a family picture... |

|
| ...his sister, Gertrude in white on his left. |
|
| 1944, Monsignor Kelley awards F.B.I. Director.... |

|
| ...J. Edgar Hoover Seton Hall's LLD with Archbishop Thomas Walsh. |
See Monsignor Kelley referenced in
the article below. Note: From 1970 on, to include after the Gervais-Irene died in July of 1982, people still weren't
sure about Kelley's friend, Irene's past or who she really was.
| From a 10/18/82 New Jersey Tribune article: |

|
| Msgr. Kelley later verified his late friend Irene Bolam's (Gervais-Irene) 'dual' identity. |
|
| Kelley's sister Gertrude & Gervais-Irene Bolam |

|
| Dubrovnik, Yugoslavia 1976. |
The truthful
nature of Monsignor Kelley's later admission to researchers, that his long time friend, Irene
Bolam really had been the woman previously known as Amelia Earhart, started getting clearer after
Beyond 37's forensic analysis commenced...
| Gervais-Irene Bolam |

|
| From Beyond 37's study, overlayed with Amelia Earhart. |
|
| Monsignor James Francis Kelley, 1946... |

|
| ...with the Smithsonian Institution's commissioned bronz bust of his likeness. |
...until finally in
2002, when it was forensically learned that three different women had been attributed to the
same Irene Craigmile Bolam identity, with the Gervais-Irene who Kelley knew matching Amelia head-to-toe and character trait wise. At that point, suddenly Monsignor
Kelley's past assertion was being taken more
seriously.
| The Gervais-Irene... |

|
| ...superimposed with Amelia Earhart. |
|
Monsignor
James Francis Kelley was a recognized U. S. emmisary of the World
Catholic Church from the 1940s to the 1980s. So many famous people either knew
or wanted to know him. In his 1987 autobiography Kelley recalled
many of his famous friendships. He was otherwise disappointed to learn that his nephew, Adrian
McBride had permitted the omission of the chapter he wrote about his friendship
with Amelia Earhart, and his experience in helping with her post-war survival
that left her known as 'Irene.' Kelley believed the decision was not his nephew's alone, as the chapter he wrote about his friendship to Charles Lindbergh remained
in the book. Monsignor Kelley's roots
were traced to British nobility, and the Gervais-Irene's British husband, Guy Bolam who
she married in 1958 was perhaps no unlikely coincidence. Guy Bolam was a former president
and co-owner of Radio Luxembourg, beyond his described link to Britain's MI6. (See more about Monsignor Kelley
below the following photos.)
| Their friendship grew much closer after WWII. |

|
| Irene (the Gervais-Irene) and Monsignor Kelley at dinner, mid-late 1970s. |
|
| Below: Research Document; Helen Barber statement. |

|
| Mrs. Barber, of Pennsylvania, spoke with and wrote to retired Col. Rollin C. Reineck |
|
How did history continue to chronicle this story?
Note: Back in 1990, after being pressured by Senator Daniel Inouye
of Hawaii to do so, Secretary of State James Baker's office confirmed a de-classified by the 1980 FOIA World War Two file
labeled 'Earhart, Amelia; Special War Problems' surfaced in State Department archives. In 1972
a file bearing such a heading had first been disclosed by
a volunteer archivist who had come across it, who cited there was "more than
one file" labeled that way. Arthur Dewayne Gibson of Verdunville, West Virginia mentioned one of the files described Amelia Earhart test flying planes in Japan's Imperial Mandate Islands in 1938.
In 1984, State Department archivist, Patricia Morton found another file labeled the same way containing
end of war correspondences to Earhart's survived husband, George Putnam. To date
the State Department has never officially elaborated on the various files' contents, nor has it explained why such a cache
of 'Earhart, Amelia; Special War Problems' labeled files left over from World War Two ever existed in the first place.
The State Department did send a letter to Senator Inouye stating the individual (in the case of 1984, archivist Patricia Morton
who later appeared in an NBC Earhart special) who located and revealed the file
she found was "not acting in an official capacity" when she came upon it. None the less, anymore
it is clear official history (likely with some quiet authoritative guidance) has tried hard to downplay
the reality of Earhart's post-loss situation, allowing for private enterprises (such as TIGHAR)
to empirically steer the curious in less controversial directions. However, the
case of Earhart's survival doesn't really appear to have been a conspiracy. That's a common incorrect
assumption, and a negative way of viewing it. Instead, it
is clear anymore that very few people, Amelia Earhart herself among
them of course, were aware of such a long-ago
private arrangement the public remained unaware of until at least 1970. Even then, after the truth first surfaced the public still couldn't
conceive of such a thing having been at all possible, let alone real. As well, where official
history has always automatically refused
to offer it any creedence, so much explains why any suggestion
of Amelia Earhart's post loss survival has left the idea to remain unendorsed by the general public, and therefore Wikipedia
as well, even though it's obviously true to those who have taken the time to seriously look into it.
Above: General Douglas MacArthur, President Franklin Roosevelt, Admiral Chester Nimitz on the USS
Baltimore, July 1944. Famous figures from the World War Two era, there is no doubt they were aware of the Earhart post-loss
situation on a higher level than the general public. In 1965 Admiral Nimitz additionally admitted it was quietly "known
and documented in Washington" that Amelia Earhart had survived to exist under the auspice of Japan. Irene Craigmile
Bolam's (the Gervais-Irene's) later life friends in General MacArthur's widow, Jean MacArthur and United States Senator, Barry
Goldwater of Arizona were also linked to a greater understanding of the Earhart matter. As became the norm for certain
war-time controversies though, at some point it was decided the official U. S. disposition about Amelia Earhart's
disappearance would evermore be greeted with a let's move on attitude, otherwise, "official silence." Thus
it remained to evermore be officially recognized; After July 2, 1937, Amelia was listed as a missing person until she was
legally declared 'dead' two years later.
"I hope
I've just got to never make it public." Part of Henry P. Morgenthau Jr.'s
initial May 13, 1938 transcripted reply to First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt concerning what really became of Amelia Earhart. The
White House was aware of the 'Earhart situation' on a level the news media and the public never came to understand. (See transcript
excerpts further down.) "You're onto something that will stagger
your imagination." U. S. Navy Commander, John Pillsbury refers to the truth about Amelia Earhart's 1937 disappearance
to CBS Radio Journalist-Earhart Author, Fred Goerner in 1962. What became of Amelia Earhart? Evidently the truth was privately known by a few select
U. S. and Japan officials long ago, and the public is finally starting to catch on to it. Note: The mystery of Amelia
Earhart came to publicly exist because it was supposed to, not because it ever really did exist.
|
|
| Another Gervais-Irene photo... |

|
| ...superimposed with Amelia. |
"I think of God as a symbol for good--thinking
good, identifying good in everybody and everything. This God I think of is not an abstraction, but a vitalizing, universal
force, eternally present, and at all times available." Amelia Earhart
|
Below: Since 1970, three
nationally published books proclaimed the Gervais-Irene as the person who was formerly known as 'Amelia Earhart.'
Why did these books never receive much public attention and/or gain acceptance? The answer: 'Official silence' left
them 'unofficially endorsed,' leaving a confused general public unable to accept such a truth. Nevertheless, evidently, and
however it remains publicly debated while quietly known by a select few; the Amelia to Irene conveyance was, is, and always
will be the truth.
| The 1970 Joe Klaas, Joe Gervais book... |

|
| ...A New York Times best seller as well, determined Amelia 'privately' survived with Japan's help. |
|
| By Robert Myers & Barbara Wiley, 1985 |

|
| A first hand account; claimed Joe Gervais was right about the 'Irene' he met in 1965. |
|
| By Colonel Rollin Reineck, 2004 |

|
| First mentioned Beyond 37's forensic study-affirmed the Gervais-Irene was 'formerly' Amelia Earhart. |
|
Only recently was it forensically revealed;
there were three different women who were attributed to the same Irene Craigmile Bolam identity, and the 'Gervais-Irene'
(below) was very special:
| Gervais-Irene (Craigmile) Bolam, 1965. |

|
| With British husband, Guy Bolam. (Photo taken by Joe Gervais after he met them.) |
|
| Blend: Gervais-Irene & Amelia |

|
| Irene-1965 / Amelia-1933 |
|
| Blend: Gervais-Irene & Amelia |

|
| Irene-1963 / Amelia-1928 |
|
| Blend: Gervais-Irene & Amelia |

|
| Irene-1976 / Amelia-1932 |
|
| Blend: Gervais-Irene & Amelia |

|
| Irene-1978 / Amelia-1929 |
|
Above: The Gervais-Irene superimposed with Amelia Earhart. In the Forensic Comparison
link, the head-to-toe congruence really is alarming.
Above: In 1965 at a gathering
of well-known retired pilots in East Hampton of Long Island, New York; World War Two hero, USAF Major Joe Gervais (Ret.) met
one of three different women who were historically attributed to the same name of 'Irene Craigmile Bolam' (nee O'Crowley.)
The one he met is labeled in the Beyond 37' study as 'the Gervais-Irene.' The study revealed how the Gervais-Irene
appeared nowhere identified as 'Irene' prior to the 1940s. Note: Contrary to what ended as an assumed public opinion
that it had been answered, as both Amelia's and the original Irene's families casually sidestepped the issue, the past 'true
identity' question of the Gervais-Irene was ultimately left unanswered by any means of 'official' historical authority. Official
United States historians and Japan's historians have long been guided to ignore the truthful reveals exhibited by this controversy.
In recent years the influence of a few outspoken 'survival-opposing' Earhart theorists tried
to steer the National Geographic Channel, Wikipedia, and Facebook toward considering other mystery solving options. No matter,
certain new truths about Earhart had been recently discovered and revealed anyway:
Given the above information, it is
odd how the public was so left in the dark about the Earhart case by way of misleading press releases such as this one: March 21, 2012 Press Release:
Secretary of State Hilary Clinton held a press conference to show her support for 'a privately funded' Earhart plane search
effort by a group known as The International Group For Historic Aircraft Recovery, aka 'TIGHAR.' Since the early 1980s TIGHAR
has promoted the notion that the south Pacific Island of Nikumaroro was the last resting place for Earhart's plane. TIGHAR
has gathered debris from the island over the years, with none of it ever being authentically linked to Earhart's last flight.
In its latest claim, an old photograph showing a piece of what TIGHAR described as 'possible landing gear' protruding from
the water near Nikumaroro has led to a new, albeit silly media frenzy. Most research experts disagree that Earhart
came anywhere near to Nikumaroro. Not to mention the island was inhabited from the 1940s to the 1960s by sixty people who
ran a coconut oil plantation, and even the U. S. Navy had a small sub-station there for awhile. No surprise, the following
day the Associated Press
updated Secretary of State Clinton's statement to include that, "The White House takes no position on Tighar's photo
analyses." Official
history likes to promote the ongoing mystery of Amelia Earhart, especially since the reality of her loss was later found in
controversial information withheld by FDR's war time administration. NOTE: 1938 FDR administration documents below
the following:
| The Original Irene O'Crowley Craigmile, 1930. |

|
| Amelia's 'pal' with her husband Charles Craigmile & her father Joe O'Crowley. |
Note:
Joe O'Crowley (above right) was the older brother of attorney I. R. O'Crowley who was Amelia Earhart's close
friend, contract advisor, and ZONTA sister. In
1931, the original Irene Craigmile lost her husband, Charles to a sudden appendicitis attack. In late 1932, Amelia Earhart and Viola Gentry arranged for the original Irene
Craigmile to take flying lessons.
In mid-1933, right after the original Irene earned her wings she became pregnant out of wedlock by her last flight instructor,
Al Heller. The original Irene Craigmile was seen no more after she gave birth to their son in 1934, yet by the mid-1940s two
other women had been attributed to her identity. This is a complex story about
a quiet historical truth involving the Executive Branch of the World War Two era. Amelia Earhart was a beautiful, wonderful person. It may not
seem so at first glance, but this website is only supportive of her.
Again, people fail to recall how Amelia Earhart was an anti-war pacifist.
Just as Charles Lindbergh did in 1937, four years before Pearl Harbor occurred, Earhart favored maintaining FDR's isolationist
viewpoint for the United States. She was also a well loved hero in Japan then, just like Babe Ruth had been, who so strongly
influenced baseball there during his visit to Japan a few years earlier. The charade of the false promoted history
of Earhart's disappearance is easier understood when these historical truths are recognized. Contrary to rumor, Japan would
have never harmed Amelia Earhart, especially where she actually opted to remain under their authority after she was
reported 'missing.'
"People need only
ask why an authorized biography was never published, or a movie was never made detailing the life of Irene Craigmile Bolam.
For beyond the uncertainty of where she actually came from after she began living on Long Island, New
York the mid-1940s, she was a worldly, classy, and fantastic person who was at times extraordinarily benevolent. She had government, clergy, and military leader friends in high places
all over the world, especially in Japan, England, and the United States. She was the corporate president of Radio Luxembourg
in the 1970s, she claimed to have been well acquainted with Amelia Earhart and to have flown with her, and from the 1ate 1940s
until she died in 1982, she knew and even hung out with several of Amelia's old friends, to include Amelia's sister Muriel
who she knew well. She even knew personell at NASA, yet, after the McGraw-Hill
book, Amelia Earhart Lives made Irene Bolam a national news item in 1970, by showing how USAF Major Joe Gervais had
discovered the deep rooted past connection between Irene and Amelia to have been no ordinary coincidence, the book
was quickly removed from the stores. Soon after all references to the controversy were quietly swept
under the rug of official history. To the few who understood it, the controversy never went away. At
the same time official history, through its use of national media resources, henceforth diminished
its true value. For example, as recently as mid-2006 cable television fell victim to entering the fray once again.
It happened after a few Amelia Earhart image protecting stalwarts learned how in April of 2006, Irene Bolam's 1934
born son had identified an entirely different woman as his childhood mother, juxtaposed to the Irene Bolam who had been referenced
and pictured in Amelia Earhart Lives by Joe Gervais. This solidified the
2002 forensic realization of there having been more than one woman who had used the same 'Irene' identity.
In response, suddenly a movement arose to produce a new Earhart special on the National Geographic Channel. It was once again
directed at influencing the American public to avoid taking the decades old Irene-Amelia controversy too seriously, even though
it never ended as an officially settled issue. Wikipedia soon followed suit. The National Geographic Channel premiered its
show in November of 2006. It was careful not to mention Irene's living son at all. Nor did it bring up the 2002
forensic discovery of more than one woman having used the same 'Irene Bolam' identity. Serving its purpose to help
keep the mystery of Amelia Earhart's 1937 disappearance in tact, (when it was fairly solved
in the private sector decades ago) the show is still airing today using new titles to keep it fresh by repurposing, still implying there was no real controversy connected to Irene Bolam, when indeed there
was, and still is." Beyond 37'
The new paradigm of the Earhart mystery to be regarded is this: Evidently, it was determined via the will
of Amelia's own family, (to foremost include Amelia's sister, Muriel who died in 1998) the will of Amelia herself, and the
support of friends Amelia had in high places; after the public accepted Amelia as 'gone' a ruse to obfuscate her continued
existence was needed. So much led to the 'official silence' regard concerning what really became of Amelia Earhart.
With a closed blind-eye from the Smithsonian Institute, and where there was never an 'official investigation'
launched into Amelia Earhart's disappearance, such a regard continues to protect this life long biographical truth about Amelia Earhart
from being welcomed into the realm of publicly accepted information.
| The original Irene Craigmile, 1930 |

|
| After her mother died she was co-raised by her paternal grandmother and her aunt, I. R. O'Crowley. |
The Original Irene Craigmile and her
Aunt, I. R. O'Crowley After July 2nd, 1937 Amelia Earhart was listed as 'a missing person.' But did she really go missing, or disappear? History described it that
way, but in recent years new information about Earhart's final destiny managed to plainly surface. It included Amelia Earhart's
past close friendship and professional alliance with the original Irene Craigmile's aunt, attorney I. R. O'Crowley,
and the ZONTA's, an international organization of professional women I. R. O'Crowley and Amelia Earhart had been distinguished
members of.
Here's what is now understood:
The forensic analysis unearthed some startling information about the never settled controversy surrounding the book Amelia
Earhart Lives. It first made national news in 1970, only to be quietly swept under the rug of 'official history.' The
analysis revealed new information about the original Irene Craigmile (the niece of attorney I. R. O'Crowley
mentioned above) and her 1930s friend, Amelia Earhart. Most remarkably, it discovered how the original Irene Craigmile
was seen no more after she gave birth to a son in 1934. Additionally, the study revealed how three different women had been
historically identified as one in the same Irene (nee O'Crowley) Craigmile Bolam, and how one of them, referred to
in the study as "the Gervais-Irene," displayed a haunting resemblance to Amelia Earhart. [Note: In 2006 the son of the original Irene Craigmile did not
identify the Gervais-Irene as the mother he recognized from his early childhood.]
"Do not believe in what you've heard. Do not believe in tradition because it is handed
down many generations. Do not believe in anything that has been spoken of many times. Do not believe because the written statements
come from some old sage. Do not believe in conjecture. Do not believe in authority or teachers or elders. But after careful
observation and analysis, when it agrees with reason and it will benefit one and all, then accept it and live by it."
Buddah (563 B.C. -
483 B.C.)
[Note: This website displays the original foundation
of the 'Earhart's private survival' story. Wikipedia's, TIGHAR's, and the
Amelia Earhart Society's versions (and other private
organizations not linked to official U. S. history sources)
tend to offer
inaccurate and misleading information. Here
one can observe elements of a comprehensive forensic analysis while further digesting extensive volumes of research data to enable full
objectivity.]
|